Re: GLUG: Lotto

Tom Cooper on Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:19:42 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GLUG: Lotto

To: hvisage <hvisage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GLUG: Lotto
From: Tom Cooper <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:19:26 +0000
Cc: glug@xxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <00bb01bf9ba1$1165fe00$1090ef9b@dwayne>; <20000403091128.A9787@hvs.envisage.co.za> <38E9055E.19112.26ECE8C@localhost> <20000404095757.A12454@hvs.envisage.co.za>
Sender: tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Apologies: it should be "49 combination 6" (Moderne Statistiek vir die
> Praktyk)
> 
> /49\ = 49!        =  49!
> \6/    ---           ---
>        6!(49-6)!     6!43!
> 
> Which is an even smaller number (720th less)
> thus it approaches R35million
> 
> This looks MUCH more doable, after the jackpot reached R40million or more...
> 
Not counting all the 2nd, third, etc. prizes you get to win ;-)

References:
- Re: GLUG: Lotto
  - From: Dwayne Bailey
- Re: GLUG: Lotto
  - From: hvisage
- Re: GLUG: Lotto
  - From: hvisage

Prev by Date: Way off subject
Next by Date: auth on RH6.2
Previous by thread: Re: GLUG: Lotto
Next by thread: Re: GLUG: Lotto
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread